B shah v. presiding officer

Author: aysh

August undefined, 2024

WebMaternity Benefit Act - Shah v. Presiding Officer, Labour Court Coimbatore (1978) o Municipal - Studocu N Shanmukh G table of contents introduction an overview of the … WebB.Shah v. Presiding officer, Labour Court, Regarding Construction of S. 5 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961. 2.Spring Meadows Hospital v,. Harjol Ahluwalia, JT 1998 (2) SC 620. Consumer Protection Act. 3.

The doctrine of Beneficial Construction - The Fact Factor

WebDec 14, 2024 · In B Shah v Presiding Officer, AIR 1978 SC 12 case, Labour Court applied the rule of beneficial construction in construing section 5 of the Maternity Benefit Act, … WebIts object is to secure proper working conditions & penalties for failure to provide such conditions are merely incidental to the object. There is no need to construe the Act restrictively, though equally there is no need to extend it beyond its natural meaning B. Shah v. Presiding Officer, Labour Court The court applied the beneficent rule of ... thin ankle strap heels

Denying maternity leave to a mother who begets child through …

WebMar 8, 2024 · On this occasion of International Women's Day, a day dedicated to honor the accomplishment of women across the globe who fought and are still fighting for gender equality and rights, let us have... WebPETITIONER:B. SHAHVs. RESPONDENT:PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, COIMBATORE & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT12/10/1977BENCH:SINGH, JASWANTBENCH:SINGH, JASWANTKRISHNAIYER, V.R.CITATION: 1978 AIR 12 … WebSupreme Court of India, B. Shah v. Presiding Officer of the Labour Court, 12 October 1977, Case No. 1978 AIR 12 1978 SCR (1) 701 Country : India Subject: Maternity … thin ankle sock for women

Beneficial Rule of Construction PDF Statutory Interpretation

Beneficial Construction PDF Welfare Labour Law - Scribd

WebMar 8, 2000 · The Maternity Benefit Act, 96, was enacted on 2.2.96, to regulate the employment of women in certain establishments for certain period, before and after child birth. Section 5 provides ...right to payment of maternity benefit. Section 5 (3) provides for twelve weeks payment. 5. WebIn the landmark case of B Shah v Presiding Officer, Labour Court, court applied beneficent rule of construction in construing section 5 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, … thin ankle strap flat sandalsWebJan 30, 2012 · The Supreme Court vide its judgment in B. Shah v. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Coimbatore [1977 (4) SCC 384] dealt with the interpretation of the maternity benefit available to the daily wage workers and set the tone for interpreting the provisions of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 [for short, ‘M.B Act’]. The following passage found in ... thin ankle socks for women

"WebJun 26, 2024 · B. Shah vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Coimbatore and others. – The Supreme Court was asked whether Sundays, which are wage-less holidays, could … " - B shah v. presiding officer

B shah v. presiding officer

Analysis & implementation of the Maternity Benefit ... - iPleaders

WebJun 9, 2008 · 4. The Supreme Court vide its judgment in B. Shah v. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Coimbatore. 1977 2 LLN 606., dealt with the interpretation of the maternity benefit available to the daily wage workers and set the tone for interpreting the provisions of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 (for short, ‘M.B Act’). The following passage found ... Web16.08.2024 passed by respondent No.1 - Presiding Officer of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens' Tribunal (for short 'Tribunal'). 1.3. ii. records and proceedings from the Respondent No.1 and after perusing the legality and propriety of …

Did you know?

WebThe Supreme Court noted in B. Shah v. Presiding Officer, Labour Court Coimbatore (1978) that it must be remembered when interpreting the terms of helpful laws like the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, which is intended to achieve the goal of ensuring social justice to female employees employed in the plantation and which squarely falls under the ... WebApr 12, 2024 · Goradia, Advocates and Mr. Ravi Vijay Ramaiya, CA i/b Shah & Ramaiya, Chartered Accountants for the Appellant. Mr. Sumit Rai, Advocate with Mr. Abhiraj Arora, Mr. Shourya Tanay, Ms. Misbah Dada, Mr. Deepanshu Agarwal, Advocates i/b ELP for the Respondent. ... Presiding Officer Ms. Meera Swarup Technical Member 11.04.2024 …

WebB. Shah v. Presiding Officer, Labour Court. This case was in relation to section 5 of the Maternity Benefit Act, with respect to the amount of wages to be given to a mother [Under the Act, wages are to be paid to an expecting mother for the days she is on leave due to pregnancy]. The question was whether WebFeb 9, 2024 · Shah vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Coimbatore and others: The question before the court was that whether Sundays are to be included in …

WebDoctrine of Occupied Field(With Cases) B.Shah v. Presiding Officer Rattan Lal v. State of Punjab Doctrine of Stare Decisis. 28th Nov 28th Nov 28th Nov 28th Nov. Bengal … WebB. SHAH Vs PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, COIMBATORE & ORS. Vs. RESPONDENT: PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, COIMBATORE & ORS. …

WebB. Shah V. Presiding Officer, A.I.R. 1978 S. C. 12. 9[5-A. Continuance of payment of maternity benefit in certain cases. -- Every woman entitled to the payment of …

WebHere,"in a hospital" only applies to doctors and not to firemen or policemen. fBENEFITIAL LEGISLATION “Salus Populi Suprema Lex” that is “the welfare of the people is the supreme law”. The object of every legislation is to advance public welfare. Justice and reason constituted the great general legislative Intent In every piece of ... thin anniversary bandWebJan 12, 2024 · The Court was not satisfied with the said argument and observed by relying on the case of B. Shah v. Presiding officer Labour Court, (1977)4 SCC 384 that interpretation of beneficial piece of legislation which is intended to achieve social justice must be construed beneficially. The Court also relied on various case laws such as Anuj … thin anklets onlineWebIn the landmark Case of B shah v Presiding Officer, Labour Court, AIR 1978 SC 12,Court applied beneficent rule of construction in continuing section 5 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961,which make up for her dissipated energy and take care of child. f … thin ankle socks for menWebApr 16, 2013 · The Presiding Judge was Justice M.B. Shah, who had differed with his brother judges on the Bench not just on the death sentence but on the very question of … thin ann vietnamese restaurant tampaWebOne of the most important cases in relation to Maternity Benefits was the B. Shah v. Presiding Officer [3], in this case, the main issue was whether working women on maternity leave should be even paid on weekends in particular on Sundays. thin ankle socks mensWebMay 25, 2016 · Municipal Corporation Of Delhi vs Female Workers (Muster Roll) And on 8 March, 2000 - Supreme Court of India B. Shah vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court, on 12 October, 1977 - Supreme Court of India Yakub Abdul Razak Memon vs State Of Maharashtra Th:Cbi on 21 March, 2013 - Supreme Court of India saint peter\u0027s fly shop fort collinsWebB. Shah vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court, ... on 12 October, 1977. appears in the document. Change context size Current. It appears that in October, 1967, Subbammal, … thin antenna wire