Cit vs ghanshyam huf
WebSep 30, 2024 · It is observed that the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT v/s Ghanshyam (HUF) 315 ITR 1 has held that interest paid on the excess amount, u/s 28 … WebNov 8, 2024 · Placing rejoinder to the above, the ld. AR again drew our attention to the copy of the order of ITAT Delhi ‘F’ Bench in the case of Ram Kishan (supra) and submitted that in this order, the Tribunal has considered lead judgement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case CIT vs. Ghanshyam (HUF) (supra) as well as the judgement of the Hon ...
Cit vs ghanshyam huf
Did you know?
WebJul 12, 2024 · In Rama Bai vs CIT, (1990) 181 ITR 400 (SC), dt. 8/11/1989, case of AY 1967-68-69, it is has held that – arrears of interest computed on delayed or enhanced … WebJul 16, 2009 · The controversy in the present batch of civil appeals pertainsto the interpretation of Section 45(5)of the Income-tax Act, 1961,as it stood prior to 1.4.2004. …
WebIn CIT Ghanshyam (HUF) [2009] 8 SCC 412, Interest earned under section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act,which is on enhanced compensation, ... Following its earlier decision in … WebAggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal to the CIT(A). In the appellate proceedings before CIT(A) it was contended that the Supreme Court has in CIT vs. Ghanshyam Dass (HUF) [2009] 315 ITR 1 held interest on enhanced compensation to be a part of compensation and therefore the same is exempt u/s. 10(37) of the Act.
WebJul 16, 2009 · Commissioner Of Income Tax, Faridabad v. Ghanshyam (Huf) . S.H Kapadia, J.— Delay condoned. Leave granted. The controversy in the present batch of … WebMay 14, 2024 · The assessee’s land was acquired by the Government of Haryana and Land Acquisition Collector had announced award on 16.07.2007 fixing the market value of the …
WebThe said issue has been considered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. Ghanshyam HUF 315 ITR 1 held that the interest paid on the excess amount u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, depends upon a claim by the person whose land is acquired, where as interest u/s 34 of Land Acquisition Act is for delay in making payment. Interest ...
WebIn these circumstances the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Ghanshyam (HUF) (Supra) and CIT Rajkot Vs. Govindbhai Mamaiya are not applicable … crystal betaineWebMay 19, 2024 · AfterGhanshyam (HUF> [2009] 315 ITR 1 (SC), it was settled thatinterest received on compensation or enhanced compensation under section 28 of Land … crystal best youtubeWebAug 28, 2024 · The CIT (A) referred to the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Ghanshyam (HUF) and relying on the same held that as per the said decision, interest … crystal bestWebApr 10, 2024 · Ghanshyam (HUF) (2009) 182 Taxman 368, wherein it was held that interest under section 28 of the Act of 1894 is part of the amount of compensation whereas … dvf luggage wendy williamsWebHUF of his son, his wife & minor children . For avoiding the clutches of sec 64 (1)(vi) such gifts better be avoided {CIT Vs Smt. T. Suryamani Kothavalsala (2003) 263 ITR 271} {CIT Vs S.N. Malhotra (1989) 178 ITR 380 (Cal)}3 • HUF can accept gifts from relations who may not be the member of the family. crystal betaWebOct 12, 2024 · The CIT(A) followed the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Ghanshyam (HUF) (supra) in coming to the above conclusion and further held that the provisions of section 57(iv) r.w.s. 56(2)(viii) r.w.s. 145A(b) of the Act were not applicable for interest on enhanced compensation as such interest was in the nature of enhanced ... crystal best friend necklacesWebMay 17, 2024 · In our considered view, the findings of the Ld. CIT (A) are based on the ratio laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Ganshyam HUF (supra) and the … crystalbet download