I recommend minor revision

Author: wlai

August undefined, 2024

WebNov 21, 2024 · After two months, I received minor revision as the decision. The statement was: ‘Your paper was found acceptable pending revision.’ I submitted the revised version, and now, the status is Under Review. What does this mean? And normally how long does this round of review take? Kind regards. Asked on 21 Nov, 2024 Answer Follow this Question WebMinor revisions and major revisions are the two most common editorial decisions after peer review. A decision of minor revisions means your work will likely not be going back to the original peer reviewers for another round of comments. This is actually a policy for many journals. Do the revisions and resubmit.

What

WebAccept with Minor Revision This is for manuscripts with minor issues and you don’t need to see the revision before the manuscript is accepted. The AE will check if all the comments are addressed. Sample reviewer comments: “ This paper proposes a novel approach towards solving the reconstruction problem of motion corrupted fetal MRI. WebThe first read-through is a skim-read. It will help you form an initial impression of the paper and get a sense of whether your eventual recommendation will be to accept or reject the paper. First Read Considerations Keep a pen and paper handy when skim-reading. chilly garlic rice

“I Recommend” Or “I Would Recommend” - Easy Usage

WebJul 13, 2024 · After submitting major revision, I got minor revision with only one comment from editor, while one reviewer accepted it (it was not sent to second reviewer). I … WebApr 15, 2024 · Six minor proposals were rejected, including forcing large companies to publish how many over-55s they employ, and the creation of a special contract for older … WebI recommend you try the meatballs. I will be recommending the meatballs tonight. Both of these examples are correct. However, “I recommend” here means we’re recommending … chilly gift of deep cold

Decision types on journal articles - Publishing Support

Instructions for Associate Editors - IEEE Transactions on Medical ...

WebAug 10, 2024 · Usually, you would see “Minor Revisions Required” or “Major Revisions Required” if the journal wants you to revise your manuscript to address specific concerns … WebMinor revision. Your article has a very good chance of being accepted for publication, but the reviewers have requested minor amendments to be made. These changes can usually … chilly garlicWebPerform any additional experiments or analyses the reviewers recommend (unless you feel that they would not make your paper better; if so, please provide sufficient explanation as to why you believe this to be the case in your response letter). Provide a polite and scientific rebuttal to any points or comments you disagree with. chilly ghost

"WebApr 16, 2024 · My review article received a minor revision with one of the comments as follows: “The advantages, disadvantages, and synergy of each strategy need to be … " - I recommend minor revision

I recommend minor revision

Minor revisions: Sample peer review comments and examples

WebApr 13, 2024 · Accept with minor revisions ... Make the recommended changes and resubmit to the same journal: This option could well be your top choice if you are keen to publish in a particular journal and if the editor has indicated that they will accept your paper if revisions are made. If the editor has issued an outright rejection and does not wish to ... WebJan 8, 2014 · First, if you agree with the reviewer, you should do exactly what the reviewer ask you to do, and mention that you have done it. Then the reviewer should be happy. Second, you can disagree with the reviewer and explain why you disagree. In this case, you only need to explain why you disagree. But you need to explain well why.

Did you know?

WebOne recommended major revision, two recommended minor revision, and one recommended acceptance.) I know that revisions, both major and minor, hint at a higher chance of acceptance. Revise and resubmit, however, is likely followed by a rejection. So I'm wondering which one this response is. THANKS!! Vote 9 9 comments Best Add a Comment Web1. The work lacks scientific merit - the manuscript does not make any significant improvement to the intended field of research. 2. Personal biases are elevated above …

WebAddress all points raised by the editor and reviewers. Describe the major revisions to your manuscript in your response letter followed by point-by-point responses to the comments … WebApr 9, 2024 · The Editorial Office is waiting for your revised manuscript. As an author, this manuscript status means that it’s time to review your manuscript and edit it using the comments provided. We expect to receive revisions within 5 days (for minor revisions) or within 10 days (for major revisions). This is inclusive of weekends and holidays.

WebApr 6, 2024 · I recommend minor revisions after addressing the few comments below. Overall, some confusion still persists regarding their O2 threshold used to define hypoxia. In their response, they explain that they considered 20 M as a upper threshold below which denitrification and anammox occurs, i.e., fixed nitrogen is transformed to N2. ... WebIn other words, if you receive such a revised manuscript for review, you should make either a recommendation to accept (possibly with a minor revision) or reject with no further …

WebMinor revision. The paper will be ready for publication after light revisions. Please list the revisions you would recommend the author makes. Major revision. The paper needs substantial changes such as expanded data analysis, widening of the literature review, or rewriting sections of the text. Reject. The paper isn’t suitable for ...

WebResponse: A minor revision often implies that there are a limited number of changes that are needed to improve the manuscript for publication. Depending on the extent of the minor revision, the editor may decide not to send it out for re-review. A major revision often requires more substantive changes prior to being appropriate for publication. grad coach conclusion chapterWebRelated to Response times for Exams requiring Sonographer review. Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.. Peer Review … chilly gets arrestedWebMinor revisions - the best you can hope for after the first round of review Major revisions - the decision we received in this case Reject – clearly, the one you want to avoid Editors … chilly gijsbrechtWebNov 27, 2024 · I have submitted my manuscript to one of the peer-reviewed journals of chemistry and the decision was 'recommended for publication subject to minor revision'. I … chilly garlic fried riceWebHowever, my supervisor told me several times when submitting papers that there's no such thing as minor revisions anymore and everyone seems to always say major just because they can. 2 of my papers came back as major revisions but it took maybe 2 hours of editing grammer and spelling to fix it. chilly girl意思WebNov 21, 2024 · I submitted my paper to a Springer journal. After two months, I received minor revision as the decision. The statement was: ‘Your paper was found acceptable … chilly gift of deep cold lt2WebJan 9, 2024 · Often the peer review process progresses smoothly through the steps: A new manuscript is submitted; appropriate reviewers are identified, invited and promptly accept; … chillyglock